It is amazing that so many doctors absolutely close their minds to the fact of how the human body works. I suppose it is that many doctors simply do not WANT to think on their own but would rather spend their time in the "treatment" of disease rather than understanding the "cause" of the disease. All is not lost however as more doctors are waking up and truly do want to provide in the best interest of people and humanity itself. As Denis Burkitt, MD (the Discoverer of Burkitt's Lymphoma)states: “The concept that Western diseases are lifestyle-related and therefore potentially preventable and reversible is the most important medical discovery of the 20th century.”
Like I've mentioned, I walk among them. I see the families with vaccine damaged children, I sit in the living rooms with those that have lost a child to a horrible death from some of the adverse reactions to vaccines, sometimes I cry with them. I spend a great deal of time with those that were diagnosed with Diabetes, Cancer, Asthma, Alzeimers, Steven's Johnson Syndrome etc. Many are actually able to reverse their conditions by simply educating themselves and making different choices in life. Those are the studies I'd like to see in the journals. Try control groups of REAL PEOPLE, leave the ferrets and rats to the ferrets and rats. Their would be no need to use animals when doing the studies with humans because what risk would there be?
Introduce good nutrition, good hydration, good breathing at the cellular level and hygiene. Would there be much risk if any at all? Think about it, humans could actually study the human body instead of monkeys, rats and the like. If we were to do studies without chemicals there would be no risk. Think of the billions of dollars that could be saved. One has to ask why is there no studies in these medical and science journals that address the natural approach? Odd isn't it?
"For anyone to sit in a position of power over others, to profit from that power, to make decisions for another, to advise them to do anything to cause potential harm to themselves or their children is VERY saddening." I would think even Mr. Gavin would have to agree on this.
We do live in a new time, a time of awareness and families are beginning to see the value in discerning information that has been shared with them. Here is a video of a Merck vaccine scientist who admits the presence of SV40 and AIDS in vaccines, in fact he is one of the most prominent vaccine scientists in the history of the vaccine industry. Listen to his words "carefully". Do not become distracted by the other voices and laughter in the background. Listen to the words of Dr. Maurice Hilleman.
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=13EAAF22CDA367BB3C2F94D2CD90EF7B
Dr. Maurice Hilleman openly admits that vaccines given to Americans were contaminated with leukemia and cancer viruses.
This isn't some conspiracy theory -- these are the words of a top Merck scientist who probably had no idea that his recording would be widely reviewed across the internet (which didn't even exist when he made this recording). He probably thought this would remain a secret forever. When asked why this didn't get out to the press, he replied "Obviously you don't go out, this is a scientific affair within the scientific community."
In other words, vaccine scientists cover for vaccine scientists. They keep all their dirty secrets within their own circle of silence and don't reveal the truth about the contamination of their vaccines.
History is an amazing tool for discovery and education. Here is just a short chapter explaining "The Drug Story" written by Morris Beale in 1949, I think many of you will be amazed as I was to learn the history of the Pharmaceutical Industry.
http://www.advancedhealthplan.com/The_Drug_Story.html
For those of you with vaccine injured children or if you are suffering with any of the so-called "degenerative diseases" I want to post a link here to a group of doctors that are looking into approaches that will enhance the body's own abilities and are not only relying on the chemical medications and the manufactured scientific studies in their practice. You may find one close to your area from this website:
http://www.acamnet.org/site/c.ltJWJ4MPIwE/b.5420171/k.76F0/Integrative_Medicine_From_ACAM__the_voice_of_integrative_medicine.htm
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Boise Weekly Article
It may just be that "science" is on the road to recovery. More Medical Doctors (MD's) are beginning to question the immediate safety and potential for long term adverse effects from many (if not ALL) of the vaccinations being given to not only children but the elderly and disabled (obviously most of their immune systems have already been compromised) community as well. To me, these doctors show the integrity of what the health industry should base its products and services. I would have to call these M.D.s, Insider Doctors. Doctors that take into account the oath they took to provide help for others, not harm. Remember there was for 1,000's of years that short pledge in the Hippocratic Oath, "First Do No Harm".
"In a just-published shocking study virology researchers at the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands have demonstrated that a regular flu vaccine in children actually worsens a key aspect of their flu-fighting immune system. This research was not conducted by vaccine-disliking scientists. Rather, it was conducted by pro-vaccine researchers who have spent their careers trying to develop better vaccines. Lead author Rogier Bodewes delivered the sobering message as he explained that flu vaccines “have potential drawbacks that have previously been under appreciated and that are also a matter of debate.”
While the study group is rather small, it involves highly advanced scientific evaluation of the immune system. The researchers collected blood from 27 healthy, unvaccinated children with an average age of 6 years old, and 14 children with cystic fibrosis who received an annual flu shot. The unvaccinated children were found to have a superior immune response, giving them broader protection against what they might face in an actual flu season, including pandemic strains.
The researchers found that the CD4 T helper cell response to the flu influenza A was present in both the unvaccinated and vaccinated children. On the one hand this means that in healthy children a vaccine was not needed to elicit a T helper cell response to the flu. Such helper cells coordinate the higher-powered adaptive immune response so that antibodies can destroy the virus. On the other hand it means that the T helper cell response in children with respiratory disease was comparable to the healthy children, potentially offering them some protection against whatever viral strains happened to be in the flu vaccine.
It is important to understand that children need to develop a healthy immune system, like going to school and getting an education. Another aspect of the flu-fighting immune system is the CD8 T cells, also called cytotoxic T cells, which destroy virally-infected cells as well as cancer cells. This is also a vital part of a robust anti-viral immune response.
In the healthy unvaccinated children a rise in these cytotoxic T cells was seen as the children got older – giving them important broad based-protection against any type of flu strain as well as a healthier immune response for knocking out any mutant cancer cells. In the unvaccinated children their immune systems were learning to become more effective as they grew older.
In contrast, the gradually increasing CD8 cytotoxic T cell response that was present in unvaccinated children was absent in the regularly vaccinated children with cystic fibrosis. Regular flu vaccines appeared to interfere with the healthy development of the immune response in a way that left a child more vulnerable to flu and potentially cancer (which was not part of this study). This means children getting flu vaccines would get some protection against whatever is in the vaccine that year but would have reduced protection against anything that wasn’t, a problem that would get worse as the child grew older. It is common that vaccines don’t cover all the viruses in any given season, especially a suddenly-emerging pandemic strain. It is also typical that viruses mutate rapidly in any given flu season, making vaccines a limited tool of effectiveness.
While this is only one angle of the vaccine issue, it is a dramatic finding. I don’t expect public health officials to discourage people from getting flu vaccines. However, I cannot understand why public health officials fail to take the most basic steps to ensure children have a robust and healthy immune response, such as promoting the vital importance of vitamin D adequacy for the anti-viral flu response. It is well known that 70% of children in the United States lack optimal vitamin D. It is obvious that public health in the United States is more about protecting vested interests and antiquated paradigms of health than truly protecting the public health."
">http://www.wellnessresources.com/health/articles/flu_vaccine_worsens_flu-fighting_cancer-fighting_immunity_in_children/
A big help here right now would be to have a copy of that study from the virology researchers at the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands. This may be something Mr. Gavin could actually help us with since he appears to have an account with the Medical Journals that charge for these studies and findings and he is such an avid researcher and may even know the doctors on the research team personally. What I am saying is that the study should be reviewed if at all possible by those that do not have a vested interest in the outcome.
My concern with many of the links to studies that Mr. Gavin and his cohorts have provided here are simply links to the very root of the problem. I do thank Mr. Gavin and his team for the time provided here, I know many of us have expanded our knowledge base on this ever increasing debate as to whether the effectiveness of vaccinations out-weigh the potential risks.
One does have to wonder why so much of this comment board has been directed at a one Dr. Wakefield's study. ("I've learned to not make a potential life-saving decision based on one man.") There happened to be two other medical doctors prior to the Dr. Wakefield's study and report. They seem to have already concluded some amazing findings with the same group, but have not been mentioned here.
Documents reveal that fourteen months before Dr Wakefield's paper was published, two other researchers -- Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Amar Dhillon -- independently documented the same problems in these children, including symptoms of autism.
Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE Dr Wakefield published his paper in The Lancet:
Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]
Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autism
Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum
Treated Asacol
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)
Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.
Hyperactive from 18 months.
Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure
Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen
core.
Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation
Acute and chronic inflammation.
Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN’S DISEASE
Child 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal development
MMR at 5 months [sic]
Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behavior
Hyperactive with food
Colonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular
hyperplasia.
Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)
Routine normal
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS**
[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of
age and MMR at 2.5. years]
Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death
(DPT)
MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week.
“measles rash” week before
Endoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular pattern
Histology - non-specific proctocolitis**
Treated
INDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITIS
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.
Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal
thereafter.
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia
Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL’s [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum
with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
Child 6 (7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction
2 years behavioral change - 2.5 years
Screaming attacks - / food related
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum
Histology - Prominent lymphoid follicles
Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL’s, increase in chronic inflammatory
cells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granuloma
INDTERMINATE COLITIS
Child 78. MMR 14 months
16 months “growling voice”
18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 years
Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of
terminal ileum
Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum
Mild proctitis with granular mucosa
Histology
Ileum - reactive follicles
Colon - bifid forms, increased IEL’s
Slight increase in inflammatory cells
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
? CROHN’S DISEASE
NOTES:
(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis
(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the final Lancet paper.
(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper
http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html
I do appreciate that more M.D.s are waking up to the facts and are taking the initiative to do what is right. Doctors have little time to research the researchers and only administer their treatments based on the curriculum used in their education programming and the marketing campaigns provided them after.
I am however all for education. In fact, history seems to be one of the best teachers. Where did it all begin? That is where we find the answers.
"In a just-published shocking study virology researchers at the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands have demonstrated that a regular flu vaccine in children actually worsens a key aspect of their flu-fighting immune system. This research was not conducted by vaccine-disliking scientists. Rather, it was conducted by pro-vaccine researchers who have spent their careers trying to develop better vaccines. Lead author Rogier Bodewes delivered the sobering message as he explained that flu vaccines “have potential drawbacks that have previously been under appreciated and that are also a matter of debate.”
While the study group is rather small, it involves highly advanced scientific evaluation of the immune system. The researchers collected blood from 27 healthy, unvaccinated children with an average age of 6 years old, and 14 children with cystic fibrosis who received an annual flu shot. The unvaccinated children were found to have a superior immune response, giving them broader protection against what they might face in an actual flu season, including pandemic strains.
The researchers found that the CD4 T helper cell response to the flu influenza A was present in both the unvaccinated and vaccinated children. On the one hand this means that in healthy children a vaccine was not needed to elicit a T helper cell response to the flu. Such helper cells coordinate the higher-powered adaptive immune response so that antibodies can destroy the virus. On the other hand it means that the T helper cell response in children with respiratory disease was comparable to the healthy children, potentially offering them some protection against whatever viral strains happened to be in the flu vaccine.
It is important to understand that children need to develop a healthy immune system, like going to school and getting an education. Another aspect of the flu-fighting immune system is the CD8 T cells, also called cytotoxic T cells, which destroy virally-infected cells as well as cancer cells. This is also a vital part of a robust anti-viral immune response.
In the healthy unvaccinated children a rise in these cytotoxic T cells was seen as the children got older – giving them important broad based-protection against any type of flu strain as well as a healthier immune response for knocking out any mutant cancer cells. In the unvaccinated children their immune systems were learning to become more effective as they grew older.
In contrast, the gradually increasing CD8 cytotoxic T cell response that was present in unvaccinated children was absent in the regularly vaccinated children with cystic fibrosis. Regular flu vaccines appeared to interfere with the healthy development of the immune response in a way that left a child more vulnerable to flu and potentially cancer (which was not part of this study). This means children getting flu vaccines would get some protection against whatever is in the vaccine that year but would have reduced protection against anything that wasn’t, a problem that would get worse as the child grew older. It is common that vaccines don’t cover all the viruses in any given season, especially a suddenly-emerging pandemic strain. It is also typical that viruses mutate rapidly in any given flu season, making vaccines a limited tool of effectiveness.
While this is only one angle of the vaccine issue, it is a dramatic finding. I don’t expect public health officials to discourage people from getting flu vaccines. However, I cannot understand why public health officials fail to take the most basic steps to ensure children have a robust and healthy immune response, such as promoting the vital importance of vitamin D adequacy for the anti-viral flu response. It is well known that 70% of children in the United States lack optimal vitamin D. It is obvious that public health in the United States is more about protecting vested interests and antiquated paradigms of health than truly protecting the public health."
">http://www.wellnessresources.com/health/articles/flu_vaccine_worsens_flu-fighting_cancer-fighting_immunity_in_children/
A big help here right now would be to have a copy of that study from the virology researchers at the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands. This may be something Mr. Gavin could actually help us with since he appears to have an account with the Medical Journals that charge for these studies and findings and he is such an avid researcher and may even know the doctors on the research team personally. What I am saying is that the study should be reviewed if at all possible by those that do not have a vested interest in the outcome.
My concern with many of the links to studies that Mr. Gavin and his cohorts have provided here are simply links to the very root of the problem. I do thank Mr. Gavin and his team for the time provided here, I know many of us have expanded our knowledge base on this ever increasing debate as to whether the effectiveness of vaccinations out-weigh the potential risks.
One does have to wonder why so much of this comment board has been directed at a one Dr. Wakefield's study. ("I've learned to not make a potential life-saving decision based on one man.") There happened to be two other medical doctors prior to the Dr. Wakefield's study and report. They seem to have already concluded some amazing findings with the same group, but have not been mentioned here.
Documents reveal that fourteen months before Dr Wakefield's paper was published, two other researchers -- Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Amar Dhillon -- independently documented the same problems in these children, including symptoms of autism.
Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE Dr Wakefield published his paper in The Lancet:
Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]
Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autism
Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum
Treated Asacol
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)
Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.
Hyperactive from 18 months.
Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure
Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen
core.
Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation
Acute and chronic inflammation.
Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN’S DISEASE
Child 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal development
MMR at 5 months [sic]
Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behavior
Hyperactive with food
Colonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular
hyperplasia.
Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)
Routine normal
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS**
[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of
age and MMR at 2.5. years]
Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death
(DPT)
MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week.
“measles rash” week before
Endoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular pattern
Histology - non-specific proctocolitis**
Treated
INDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITIS
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.
Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal
thereafter.
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia
Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL’s [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum
with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
Child 6 (7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction
2 years behavioral change - 2.5 years
Screaming attacks - / food related
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum
Histology - Prominent lymphoid follicles
Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL’s, increase in chronic inflammatory
cells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granuloma
INDTERMINATE COLITIS
Child 78. MMR 14 months
16 months “growling voice”
18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 years
Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of
terminal ileum
Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum
Mild proctitis with granular mucosa
Histology
Ileum - reactive follicles
Colon - bifid forms, increased IEL’s
Slight increase in inflammatory cells
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
? CROHN’S DISEASE
NOTES:
(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis
(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the final Lancet paper.
(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper
http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html
I do appreciate that more M.D.s are waking up to the facts and are taking the initiative to do what is right. Doctors have little time to research the researchers and only administer their treatments based on the curriculum used in their education programming and the marketing campaigns provided them after.
I am however all for education. In fact, history seems to be one of the best teachers. Where did it all begin? That is where we find the answers.
Friday, December 23, 2011
Whooping Cough
Just about a year ago, some may remember, newspapers throughout North America announced an epidemic of whooping cough in California that health officials predicted would spread throughout the country.
From January to November 30, 2010, California's state epidemiologist reported 2,625 pertussis cases including ten infant deaths while the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 18,586 cases nationwide.[1] In perfect timing with media reports, public health departments urged families to make sure their children have had all five of the triple antigen DTaP vaccine. Most health departments even encouraged older children and adults to get this vaccine since drug companies have now formulated pertussis vaccines just for them.
News reports wildly speculated that the outbreak was due to the number of unvaccinated children in some California school districts. Out of 7,200 schools in California,, 175 schools had vaccine exemption rates of 20 percent or more while a few were over 70 percent.[2] Despite the growing number of families claiming a personal belief exemption to required shots, only about 2 percent throughout the state claim an exemption. So with 98 percent of children taking all CDC recommended vaccines, herd immunity is covered and blaming the unvaccinated for the outbreak defies logic. What these reports fail to mention is the number of fully vaccinated children who came down with whooping cough.
Vaccine failures
The push for family members and young children to rush and get their DTaP shot is certainly unwarranted when one looks at the many well-documented cases of “vaccine failure” in communities that experienced record numbers of whooping cough cases. In 1996 there was a statewide outbreak of pertussis in Vermont where vaccination rates were among the highest in the country and yet 97 percent of affected children 19-35 months of age had received the recommended number of vaccines. [3] More recently, The Star-Ledger reported on February 11, 2009 of a pertussis outbreak in 21 fully vaccinated children in Hunterdon county, New Jersey.[4] Closer to home, in Toronto, Ontario, from October 2005 to March 2006, a laboratory-confirmed outbreak of pertussis occurred in fully-vaccinated preschool children.[5] Even the British Medical Journal reported on a study revealing that 55 of the 64 children who presented seriological evidence of a recent Bordetella pertussis infection had been fully vaccinated.[6]
The Watchdog Institute, an investigative journalism center based in San Diego, recently teamed up with kpbs.org to research the number of families affected by the whooping cough outbreak that had been fully vaccinated against pertussis. Their four-month investigation culminated in the airing of a documentary on December 16, 2010. They revealed that of the nine counties in California most affected, 44 to 83 percent of the victims had been fully vaccinated. In Ohio and Texas, two states also having record numbers of whooping cough cases, 75 and 67.5 percent respectively had been vaccinated. Dr. Fritz Mooi, a respected Dutch scientist who has been studying pertussis bacteria mutations for 15 years, claims a more virulent strain not in the DTP or DTaP vaccines is the cause of recent outbreaks. Mooi said his research is being ignored since those who influence public policy on pertussis here and abroad rely on vaccine manufacturers to fund their research and meetings. [7]
1. www.cdc.gov MMWR for week 48 Table II, Part 7
2.Whooping Cough in California Worries Officials http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ColdandFlu/whooping-cough-epidemic-california-lax-vaccination-blame/story?id=11000305&page=2
3. The Vaccine Safety Manual by Neil Z.Miller, New Atlantean Press, 2008. p. 139
4. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal: July 2009 - Volume 28 - Issue 7 - pp 582-587
5.“Whooping Cough returns to Hunterdon County” by Mike Frasinelli, The Star-Ledger, February 11, 2009 http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/02/whooping_cough_returns_to_hunt.html
6. BMJ 2006; 333 : 174 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38870.655405.AE (Published 7 July 2006)
http://www.bmj.com/content/333/7560/174.abstract
7. http://www.watchdoginstitute.org/2010/12/13/whooping-cough-epidemic-california/
Here again I am posting the study that explains the potential contributor to Whooping Cough outbreaks in certain areas of California. http://harpub.co.cc/whoop/index.htm
From January to November 30, 2010, California's state epidemiologist reported 2,625 pertussis cases including ten infant deaths while the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 18,586 cases nationwide.[1] In perfect timing with media reports, public health departments urged families to make sure their children have had all five of the triple antigen DTaP vaccine. Most health departments even encouraged older children and adults to get this vaccine since drug companies have now formulated pertussis vaccines just for them.
News reports wildly speculated that the outbreak was due to the number of unvaccinated children in some California school districts. Out of 7,200 schools in California,, 175 schools had vaccine exemption rates of 20 percent or more while a few were over 70 percent.[2] Despite the growing number of families claiming a personal belief exemption to required shots, only about 2 percent throughout the state claim an exemption. So with 98 percent of children taking all CDC recommended vaccines, herd immunity is covered and blaming the unvaccinated for the outbreak defies logic. What these reports fail to mention is the number of fully vaccinated children who came down with whooping cough.
Vaccine failures
The push for family members and young children to rush and get their DTaP shot is certainly unwarranted when one looks at the many well-documented cases of “vaccine failure” in communities that experienced record numbers of whooping cough cases. In 1996 there was a statewide outbreak of pertussis in Vermont where vaccination rates were among the highest in the country and yet 97 percent of affected children 19-35 months of age had received the recommended number of vaccines. [3] More recently, The Star-Ledger reported on February 11, 2009 of a pertussis outbreak in 21 fully vaccinated children in Hunterdon county, New Jersey.[4] Closer to home, in Toronto, Ontario, from October 2005 to March 2006, a laboratory-confirmed outbreak of pertussis occurred in fully-vaccinated preschool children.[5] Even the British Medical Journal reported on a study revealing that 55 of the 64 children who presented seriological evidence of a recent Bordetella pertussis infection had been fully vaccinated.[6]
The Watchdog Institute, an investigative journalism center based in San Diego, recently teamed up with kpbs.org to research the number of families affected by the whooping cough outbreak that had been fully vaccinated against pertussis. Their four-month investigation culminated in the airing of a documentary on December 16, 2010. They revealed that of the nine counties in California most affected, 44 to 83 percent of the victims had been fully vaccinated. In Ohio and Texas, two states also having record numbers of whooping cough cases, 75 and 67.5 percent respectively had been vaccinated. Dr. Fritz Mooi, a respected Dutch scientist who has been studying pertussis bacteria mutations for 15 years, claims a more virulent strain not in the DTP or DTaP vaccines is the cause of recent outbreaks. Mooi said his research is being ignored since those who influence public policy on pertussis here and abroad rely on vaccine manufacturers to fund their research and meetings. [7]
1. www.cdc.gov MMWR for week 48 Table II, Part 7
2.Whooping Cough in California Worries Officials http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ColdandFlu/whooping-cough-epidemic-california-lax-vaccination-blame/story?id=11000305&page=2
3. The Vaccine Safety Manual by Neil Z.Miller, New Atlantean Press, 2008. p. 139
4. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal: July 2009 - Volume 28 - Issue 7 - pp 582-587
5.“Whooping Cough returns to Hunterdon County” by Mike Frasinelli, The Star-Ledger, February 11, 2009 http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/02/whooping_cough_returns_to_hunt.html
6. BMJ 2006; 333 : 174 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38870.655405.AE (Published 7 July 2006)
http://www.bmj.com/content/333/7560/174.abstract
7. http://www.watchdoginstitute.org/2010/12/13/whooping-cough-epidemic-california/
Here again I am posting the study that explains the potential contributor to Whooping Cough outbreaks in certain areas of California. http://harpub.co.cc/whoop/index.htm
Please Bare With Me
Today is a new day. It Is Here NOW! (you'll also see a website www.ItIsHereNOW.com if you like) Today is the Winter Solstice. To me it is the beginning of my new year, I live by the seasons as most of you know. Looking forward to a Wonder-FULL new year. My motto is Live, Love & Breath. I believe we are all here for a calling and my Intent is to follow the Light, it is the only thing that makes sense in this world, in these times. I believe we are in the New Beginning. (you may also want to check out www.UnitedWeLight.com) You that know me, know I Love you ALL.
So please bare with me, I've been diverted to a subject that I've really already put 12 years of study into but unfortunately I erred in presuming that enough material has been provided through out the Internet, the Libraries, schools, medical professionals, universities etc, that more so-called "educated" people would already have discovered, or at least contemplated the options truly available to people.
Sorry, I'll get more to the point here, don't mean to be rambling. (but I am a bit excited) I caught an article this past week about Boise Idaho. My sister used to live there so I reviewed it. It was an article in the Boise Weekly about vaccinations. There is a comment board at the bottom of the article on the webpage so knowing what I've learned from researching, talking with medical doctors, scientists, professor, chemists, biochemists, patients, care-givers, nurses etc. I thought it reasonable to ask a question if any studies had been done on if any connection at all vaccinations may have in later developing Diabetes.
I thought this to be a simple enough question since that is where we are in our studies and research. (Trying to determine, actually trying to find someone, anyone that has Diabetes and has NOT been vaccinated.) As a matter of fact, we've yet to find someone that has Cancer and has NOT been vaccinated. I am not saying that vaccinations must surely lead to Diabetes and/or Cancer, just saying our research group of now over 5,000 has yet to find someone. (if you know of someone that has Diabetes and/or Cancer I would very much like to talk with them)
So, making a long story short, I will be posting some resource/research material here for "who knows how long" and do make use of the information if you wish. My time is your time, if we can help each other along the way I think we'll get there much quicker. :)
Before this Comment Board grabbed my attention I was totally engulfed in my newest project for the New Year, thankfully it also works synergistically with the previous plans, just maybe an enhanced version. :) Merry Christmas to ALL! I know it is coming up in a couple of days. My love is with each of you ALL Ways!
Oh, here is a link to the article that grabbed my attention:
http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/idahos-epidemic-of-fear-vaccination-liberation-movement-takes-a-shot-at-public-health/Content?oid=2562103&cb=a3950526e475f00ff28dee9e52cfa560&sort=desc#readerComments
So please bare with me, I've been diverted to a subject that I've really already put 12 years of study into but unfortunately I erred in presuming that enough material has been provided through out the Internet, the Libraries, schools, medical professionals, universities etc, that more so-called "educated" people would already have discovered, or at least contemplated the options truly available to people.
Sorry, I'll get more to the point here, don't mean to be rambling. (but I am a bit excited) I caught an article this past week about Boise Idaho. My sister used to live there so I reviewed it. It was an article in the Boise Weekly about vaccinations. There is a comment board at the bottom of the article on the webpage so knowing what I've learned from researching, talking with medical doctors, scientists, professor, chemists, biochemists, patients, care-givers, nurses etc. I thought it reasonable to ask a question if any studies had been done on if any connection at all vaccinations may have in later developing Diabetes.
I thought this to be a simple enough question since that is where we are in our studies and research. (Trying to determine, actually trying to find someone, anyone that has Diabetes and has NOT been vaccinated.) As a matter of fact, we've yet to find someone that has Cancer and has NOT been vaccinated. I am not saying that vaccinations must surely lead to Diabetes and/or Cancer, just saying our research group of now over 5,000 has yet to find someone. (if you know of someone that has Diabetes and/or Cancer I would very much like to talk with them)
So, making a long story short, I will be posting some resource/research material here for "who knows how long" and do make use of the information if you wish. My time is your time, if we can help each other along the way I think we'll get there much quicker. :)
Before this Comment Board grabbed my attention I was totally engulfed in my newest project for the New Year, thankfully it also works synergistically with the previous plans, just maybe an enhanced version. :) Merry Christmas to ALL! I know it is coming up in a couple of days. My love is with each of you ALL Ways!
Oh, here is a link to the article that grabbed my attention:
http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/idahos-epidemic-of-fear-vaccination-liberation-movement-takes-a-shot-at-public-health/Content?oid=2562103&cb=a3950526e475f00ff28dee9e52cfa560&sort=desc#readerComments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)